
On 3/12/22 09:51, Jagan Teki wrote:
On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 10:18 PM Johan Jonker jbx6244@gmail.com wrote:
Move ROCKCHIP_STIMER_BASE to Kconfig.
Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker jbx6244@gmail.com
Changed V3: add ROCKCHIP_STIMER
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/Kconfig | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/arm/mach-rockchip/px30/Kconfig | 3 +++ arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3036/Kconfig | 3 +++ arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3128/Kconfig | 3 +++ arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk322x/Kconfig | 3 +++ arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3288/Kconfig | 3 +++ arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3308/Kconfig | 10 ++++++---- arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3328/Kconfig | 3 +++ arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3368/Kconfig | 3 +++ arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/Kconfig | 3 +++ arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3568/Kconfig | 3 +++ include/configs/px30_common.h | 1 - include/configs/rk3036_common.h | 1 - include/configs/rk3128_common.h | 1 - include/configs/rk322x_common.h | 1 - include/configs/rk3288_common.h | 1 - include/configs/rk3308_common.h | 1 - include/configs/rk3328_common.h | 1 - include/configs/rk3368_common.h | 1 - include/configs/rk3399_common.h | 1 - include/configs/rk3568_common.h | 1 - 21 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/Kconfig index da6871eb..7a624c64 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/Kconfig @@ -343,6 +343,28 @@ config ROCKCHIP_BOOT_MODE_REG The Soc will enter to different boot mode(defined in asm/arch-rockchip/boot_mode.h) according to the value from this register.
+config ROCKCHIP_STIMER
bool "Rockchip STIMER support"
default y
depends on (ROCKCHIP_PX30|| \
ROCKCHIP_RK3036|| \
ROCKCHIP_RK3128|| \
ROCKCHIP_RK322X|| \
ROCKCHIP_RK3288|| \
ROCKCHIP_RK3308|| \
ROCKCHIP_RK3328|| \
ROCKCHIP_RK3368|| \
ROCKCHIP_RK3399|| \
ROCKCHIP_RK3568)
What if we select !(SOC-Which-don't-support-stimer). I believe the condition check here is much simpler.
The condition would be simpler that's correct, but this patch is made with rk3066 in mind and there's no ROCKCHIP_RK3066 available yet. The right approach is to only include SoC's that have a specific property/functionality linked to there specific config tag. U-boot should be generic. And we should not have to fix all dependencies all over the place when a SoC doesn't have something.
Please advise how to support other SoC's like rk3066.
Johan
Jagan.