On 2/12/19 10:35 AM, Chee, Tien Fong wrote: [...]
my preference for the fit image would be
... images { fpga@1 { description = "FPGA Periph"; ... type = "fpga_periph"; ... } fpga@2 { description = "FPGA Core"; ... type = "fpga" or "fpga_core";
I'm good with "fpga".
... } }; configurations { default = "config@1" config@1 { fpga = "fpga@1"; // periph only }; config@2 { fpga = "fpga@1", "fpga@2"; }; };
with the expectation that the order of fpga@1 and fpga@2 in config@2 is not relevant. the code should find the fpga_periph type and program it first. just my comment, i dont like rellying on the order or name.
I can add support for above implementation although this adds more complexity to the driver.
You can have fpga node and e.g. fpga-name node in the configurations section to discern which phandle there is the core and which is the peripheral RBF. Would that work ?
Marek, are you OK with this implementation?
Looks OK to me. Dalon ?
[...]