Hi Kever,
On Sun, 31 Mar 2019 at 19:03, Kever Yang kever.yang@rock-chips.com wrote:
Hi Simon,
On 03/31/2019 05:18 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Kever,
On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 at 21:01, Kever Yang kever.yang@rock-chips.com wrote:
Rockchip use 'arch-rockchip' instead of arch-$(SOC) as common header file path, so that we can get the correct path directly.
Can you give a few more details on the reason for this change? I cannot see the benefit?
- 'rockchip' is not SOC name but vendor name, we'd better use correct name;
- the build system will include $(SOC)-u-boot.dtsi automatically
without modify $(SOC).dtsi or $(board).dtsi, if the $(SOC) default to 'rockchip', we can't use this feature.
OK I see.
So far Rockchip has been designed so that a single U-Boot (proper) can support multiple SoCs, although in practice we don't use that ability. So I don't think it is a big problem to drop it.
Regards, Simon