5 Apr
2013
5 Apr
'13
11:09 p.m.
On 04/05/2013 02:00 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On 04/05/2013 04:50 PM, York Sun wrote:
When we copy code/data to the main memory, we may need to flush the cache if required by architecture. It uses the existing function flush_cache. Syntax is
flush <addr> <size>
The addr and size are given in hexadecimal. Like memory command, there is no sanity check for the parameters.
Signed-off-by: York Sun yorksun@freescale.com --- Change since v2: rename flush_cache to flush
Wait, why? flush_cache was clear as to what we were doing, flush less so. At least that's my first reaction.
Scott suggested the underscore is not recommended for the command name. Shall I change it to cacheflush or flushcache?
York