Hi Liya,
On 1/15/25 2:56 AM, 1425075683@qq.com wrote:
[You don't often get email from 1425075683@qq.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
From: Liya Huang 1425075683@qq.com
Please have some commit log in there justifying the change. There seems to be some issues with the commit title so probably part of it should be in the commit log rather than in the title (one needs an empty line between the commit title and the start of the commit log when editing the commit "description" with a text editor).
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org Reviewed-by: Pali Rohár pali@kernel.org
Same remark as for your other patch (https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/3d51107a-4761-4de8-9bae-a462c2a8e890@cherry.d...), pasting here what I said there:
""" This... is odd. I don't see an earlier version of that patch and your name/mail only returns two patches on the U-Boot mailing list. I believe Reviewed-by needs to be publicly given on the ML as they are a proof of review by the mentioned person and is usually a trust mark for maintainers to merge code. Here it may have been added without Simon's consent. Now imagine Simon is not answering for a few days/weeks, the maintainer could still believe Simon went through a proper review and merge that patch taking that into account while no review may actually have been conducted. This is making me uncomfortable.
[...]
I'm not saying review wasn't done properly, but its acknowledgment should be made public by the mentioned person instead of being put into the v1.
Have I missed an earlier version or discussion maybe? """
Even odder is that Pali has explicitly requested to not be receiving any mail from the U-Boot project anymore, c.f. https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/20231106090908.7938-1-xypron.glpk@gmx.de/. That doesn't exclude him for doing reviews of course but that is still odd. I'm explicitly keeping him in Cc here as I am not sure this went through the proper review process and he may not want his name put in there acknowledging something he might not have done.
Cheers, Quentin