-----Original Message----- From: Jason [mailto:u-boot@lakedaemon.net] Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 7:38 AM To: Prafulla Wadaskar Cc: clint@debian.org; wd@denx.de; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Prabhanjan Sarnaik; Ashish Karkare; Siddarth Gore; bdale@gag.com Subject: Re: RFC [PATCH 5/5 v5] dreamplug: use MACH_TYPE_DREAMPLUG
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:40:27AM -0700, Prafulla Wadaskar wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: Jason Cooper [mailto:u-boot@lakedaemon.net] Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 2:49 AM To: clint@debian.org; wd@denx.de; Prafulla Wadaskar Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Prabhanjan Sarnaik; Ashish Karkare;
Siddarth
Gore; bdale@gag.com; Jason Cooper Subject: RFC [PATCH 5/5 v5] dreamplug: use MACH_TYPE_DREAMPLUG
Sorry about my related comments in patch 4/5, you can merge this patch to 4/5 to avoid confusion.
See my comments in my reply to 4/5. I'd like (if possible) to get this merged before h*ll freezes over (Linux arm tree cleaned up). So, I'm trying to break the patch up into logical migration pieces.
Since every Dreamplug on the market sets and uses MACH_TYPE_GURUPLUG, I think it's reasonable to use it (hopefully merged into u-boot) until the linux-arm tree gets sorted out and they accept new boards / machids. Then, the last patch can be added.
Am I way off base with that idea?
So this is gating to provide dreamplug as separate board support or anther version for guruplug.
Regards.. Prafulla . .