Paulraj, Sandeep wrote:
Wolfgang, Dirk,
I can take responsibility for TI DaVinci SOCs.
This means an omap/davinci split ? u-boot-arm-omap u-boot-arm-davinci
This is ok with me Tom
Thanks, Sandeep ________________________________________ From: u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de [u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Dirk Behme [dirk.behme@googlemail.com] Sent: Saturday, September 05, 2009 3:39 AM To: Wolfgang Denk Cc: Tom Rix; Kyungmin Park; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Magnus Lilja; Minkyu Kang Subject: Re: [U-Boot] RFC: split ARM repo and distribute workload
Dear Wolfgang,
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Texas Instruments (OMAP): Dirk Behme? Or are there any volunteers at TI?
I really like to see someone from TI here, instead.
Looking at some past discussions, I think somebody from TI would be the best. E.g.:
- While discussing the board/vendor directory change, we were unsure
who might be the vendor of which board. Somebody from TI would know best.
- While discussing the OMAP3 cache move, we were unsure what's about
the ROM code calling and where/when this is necessary. Someone from TI would know best, too.
- etc, etc.
Best regards
Dirk _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot