On Feb 23, 2009, at 12:14 PM, Jon Loeliger wrote:
On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 01:00 +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Kim, Andy & Jon,
I have the following patches still marked as open in my list. Could you please have a look...
8xxx:
02/04 Jon Loeliger Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/8] mpc86xx: Add support to populate addr map based on BATs 02/04 Jon Loeliger Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 8/8] mpc8641hpcn: Change PCI MEM pci bus address 02/04 Jon Loeliger Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/8] mpc8641hpcn: Set up outbound pci windows before inbound 02/04 Jon Loeliger Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/8] mpc8641hpcn: Clean up PCI mapping concepts
02/12 Becky Bruce [U-Boot] [PATCH] mpc8641hpcn: Indicate 36- bit addr map in boot messages 02/12 Becky Bruce [U-Boot] [PATCH] MPC86xx: set CONFIG_MAX_MEM_MAPPED to 2G by default 02/12 Becky Bruce Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] MPC86xx: set CONFIG_MAX_MEM_MAPPED to 2G by default 02/12 Jon Loeliger Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] MPC86xx: set CONFIG_MAX_MEM_MAPPED to 2G by default
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
Wolfgang,
It was my belief that all outstanding 86xx patches had either been Acked-by me and should be picked up by either Andy or Wolfgang, or had been subsumed into other already applied patches.
Becky (or Kumar?),
Could you verify that the 36-bit and address-map related patches are correct in WD's current master head and that you are happy with them? I thought we got them all there, but I could be wrong. Or maybe we need to wait for a set to be picked up with the 85xx tree from Andy still?
So, there are only 2 patches of mine outstanding (the third message above is just a note about a dependency).
This one should still apply and needs to be picked up, WD can pick it up directly because it's very small:
02/12 Becky Bruce [U-Boot] [PATCH] mpc8641hpcn: Indicate 36- bit addr map in boot messages
The second one looks like it won't apply anymore due to a change from Stefan; I will submit a new one that WD can pick up directly as long as it's OK with you.
Cheers, Becky