On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Sughosh Ganu urwithsughosh@gmail.com wrote:
hi,
On Wed Oct 27, 2010 at 11:22:17AM +0300, Darius Augulis wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Sughosh Ganu urwithsughosh@gmail.com wrote:
Not sure which core are you referring to. I checked for arm926ejs, and we have conditional code inclusion based on the definition of CONFIG_SYS_ARM_WITHOUT_RELOC. So the start address in both the cases is determined based on whether relocation is enabled or not.
The same is at least for arm926ejs, arm1136, arm1176. As you probably know CONFIG_SYS_ARM_WITHOUT_RELOC support will be removed soon and I'm talking about code which is under #ifndef CONFIG_SYS_ARM_WITHOUT_RELOC.
Umm. I am not sure i get you here. If CONFIG_SYS_ARM_WITHOUT_RELOC is not defined, it means we have enabled relocation, so all the address calculation should be w.r.t the relocation address.
No, there could be several different relocation methods - with and without preloader etc. There is another definition CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT which changes boot sequence dramatically. And it isn't CONFIG_SYS_ARM_WITHOUT_RELOC dependent.
Darius.
-sughosh