28 Jun
2004
28 Jun
'04
9:11 a.m.
Robert Schwebel wrote:
On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 01:25:40PM +0200, Steven Scholz wrote:
how will we call the Motorola i.MX processors in future?
Will it be "imx", "i.MX", "iMX" or MC9328MX{1,21,L}?
The original 2.4 Linux port was mx1ads which is definitely wrong: it is the name of the Motorola development board. Following the scheme of the other architectures and platforms I would vote for imx.
Following the scheme of the other architectures and platforms _and_ speaking as a hardware developer I would vote for MC9328MX... Or at least "iMX".
Should we call the eval board "mx1ads" oder "M93281ADS" as Motorola does and as it is printed on it?
mx1ads would be fine for me.
(see above) M93281ADS.
Anyone else? ;-)
Steven