
29 Jul
2008
29 Jul
'08
11:25 p.m.
In message 2A2FDF2A-7B9D-496C-960C-A7A0BDCE412C@kernel.crashing.org you wrote:
Is there any concern with moving .bss outside of the image? On 85xx the images have historically been a fixed size (512k) and the .bss has always lived inside of that region. We are now getting to a point that .text + .data + .bss exceeds 512k. Its easy enough to move .bss right pass the 512k boundary and wanted to see if anyone can think of a reason not to do this.
You have to make sure that the memory map is still OK in the relocated system, taking into account for config options like pRAM, shared log buffer, frame buffer, ...
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de
The project was large enough and management communication poor enough
to prompt many members of the team to see themselves as contestants
making brownie points, rather than as builders making programming
products. Each suboptimized his piece to meet his targets; few
stopped to think about the total effect on the customer.
- Fred Brooks, "The Mythical Man Month"