On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 11:02 PM Lukasz Majewski lukma@denx.de wrote:
Hi Ramon,
Instead of relaying on user to configure MEMORY_BANKS_MAX correctly, use VLA (variable length array) to accommodate the required banks.
Fixes: 2a1f4f1758b5 ("Revert "fdt_support: Use CONFIG_NR_DRAM_BANKS if defined"")
Signed-off-by: Ramon Fried ramon.fried@gmail.com
Resending same patch but with the right email address common/fdt_support.c | 9 ++------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/common/fdt_support.c b/common/fdt_support.c index 34d2bd59c4..e8982367a0 100644 --- a/common/fdt_support.c +++ b/common/fdt_support.c @@ -409,19 +409,14 @@ static int fdt_pack_reg(const void *fdt, void *buf, u64 *address, u64 *size, return p - (char *)buf; }
-#define MEMORY_BANKS_MAX 4 int fdt_fixup_memory_banks(void *blob, u64 start[], u64 size[], int banks) { int err, nodeoffset; int len, i;
u8 tmp[MEMORY_BANKS_MAX * 16]; /* Up to 64-bit address +64-bit size */
u8 tmp[banks * 16]; /* Up to 64-bit address + 64-bit size */Why cannot we read the RAM size from "memory" DTS property? SDRAM is continuous - there are no "holes" in it.
The memory banks and their sizes are going to be replaced by DTS "memory" description anyway.
I'm not sure I understand what your suggesting. The whole purpose of this function is to fixup the DTS, so how can we read the information from it ?
if (banks > MEMORY_BANKS_MAX) {printf("%s: num banks %d exceeds hardcoded limit %d."" Recompile with higher MEMORY_BANKS_MAX?\n",__FUNCTION__, banks, MEMORY_BANKS_MAX);
if (!banks) return -1;
} err = fdt_check_header(blob); if (err < 0) {Best regards,
Lukasz Majewski
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de