Hi Joe,
On 6 April 2015 at 14:41, Joe Hershberger joe.hershberger@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Simon,
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Joe Hershberger joe.hershberger@ni.com wrote:
This series is fairly disruptive in naming, so hopefully there aren't many network stack changes in flight that will conflict with this. This is based on top of dm/next for now so that the dm/eth series is assumed. This will be rebased when that is, but will likely not have issues.
Like ripping off a bandage, do it quick and all at once.
It would be good if you can pull this in through dm/next if there are no oppositions, since this depends on that tree and will be disruptive if left out for any amount of time.
OK I can do that. The merge window opens in a week so it is good timing.
Regards, Simon