On 09/24/2012 06:51:40 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 07:01:19PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
Update CONFIG_RAMBOOT and CONFIG_NAND_SPL references to accept
CONFIG_SPL
and CONFIG_SPL_BUILD, respectively. CONFIG_NAND_SPL can be removed
once
the last mpc85xx nand_spl target is gone.
CONFIG_RAMBOOT will need to remain for other use cases, but it
doesn't
seem right to overload it for meaning SPL as well as nand_spl
does. Even
if it's somewhat appropriate for the main u-boot, the SPL itself
isn't
(necessarily) ramboot, and we don't have separate configs for SPL
and
main u-boot. It was also inconsistent, as other platforms such as mpc83xx didn't use CONFIG_RAMBOOT in this way.
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood scottwood@freescale.com Cc: Andy Fleming afleming@gmail.com
[snip]
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/u-boot-spl.lds
b/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/u-boot-spl.lds
new file mode 100644 index 0000000..372195d --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/u-boot-spl.lds @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
[snip]
+OUTPUT_ARCH(powerpc) +SECTIONS
Can we add MEMORY declarations like (some) of the ARM linker scripts do so when we grow beyond the max size it's a link error?
It's already a linker error, because you get an overlap with the reset vector.
-Scott