Hi Simon, Tom,
On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 08:24:54 +0100 Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org wrote:
Hi Masahiro,
On 21 November 2014 08:11, Masahiro Yamada yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com wrote:
Simon,
On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 08:00:27 +0100 Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org wrote:
Hi Tom,
Here's the introduction of bare x86 support.
The following changes since commit 4d70b34d7f721d8b1d4d628e68c3a44ab7a10dff:
Merge branch 'master' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-ubi (2014-11-19 23:18:29 -0500)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.denx.de/u-boot-x86.git
for you to fetch changes up to fe5b9b447c6eea3873833b1f3ba15c9854aa2ef8:
x86: Rename chromebook-x86 to coreboot (2014-11-21 07:34:16 +0100)
Bin Meng (4): x86: Do CPU identification in the early phase x86: Do TSC MSR calibration only for known/supported CPUs x86: Add quick TSC calibration via PIT x86: Save TSC frequency in the global data
Masahiro Yamada (1): x86: use CONFIG_SYS_COREBOOT to descend into coreboot/ directory
Wait, this patch was posted as a series.
It should not be applied without the others in my series. What is going on?
I applied this to x86 a while back - it actually was the same as a patch I had locally so I picked up yours instead. It works fine on x86 and I think it is independent of the series.
So I know this is a bit unusual but I think it is OK.
Understood, but I am a bit unhappy because - The subject "x86: use CONFIG_SYS_COREBOOT to descend into coreboot/ directory" is totally unrelated to the actual code - The first hunk was lost of my original patch, so I have to resend my series to get it back.
Tom, if possible, after you pull this, can you rephrase the commit subject locally? For ex.
"x86: use CONFIG_SYS_COREBOOT to descend into coreboot/ directory"
->
"x86: remove redundant CONFIG_SYS_COREBOOT references"
I will resend my series lator...
Best Regards Masahiro Yamada