On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 02:47:51PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Tom,
On 3 December 2013 14:34, Tom Rini trini@ti.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 02:24:40PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Tom,
On 2 December 2013 13:27, Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org wrote:
+Tom
Hi,
On 2 December 2013 12:02, Mateusz Zalega m.zalega@samsung.com wrote:
On 11/29/13 02:00, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
How come 13/13 is missing?
It's not.
I think it was missing until someone approved it, since it was over the 100KB limit.
What do you think of this series? Do you think it is ready to apply?
I think we're where it needs wider testing now, yes. But given that we've stumbled onto another problem or two with the bootm refactoring series, I'm really hesitant to pull something else big in for this release. Kbuild style Makefiles this time, start DM for v2014.04 is my plan currently.
Sounds reasonable. It's ready to go, hopefully won't need a lot of care and feeding before then.
Re bootm I am still not thrilled with the outcome. We flushed out quite a few cases in dark corners at great expense, but don't have a lot of automated tests (only the vboot test actually runs bootm I think). Any ideas on what we should do here?
Well, did you see where Michal's test case was? It looks like that should fail anywhere, not just microblaze. For now, I really just want to get this latest bug fixed.