5 Nov
2020
5 Nov
'20
9:15 p.m.
Hi Wolfgang,
On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 at 12:10, Wolfgang Denk wd@denx.de wrote:
Dear Simon.
In message CAPnjgZ3DmeaincEcYkjeTuRijqtMZhJiDnyx_o4eSRE4gJaVFw@mail.gmail.com you wrote:
setexpr c *10 + *100
I don't get it. The equivalent to "${a}${b}" would be
setexpr c "*10*100"which is even simpler?
I don't see how that works. The *10 thing in my example reads a string out of address 10.
Ah, got it. This requires your "[PATCH 10/10] setexpr: Add support for strings" first...
But then... should there not be some '.s' size specification somewhere?
Ooops yes:
setexpr.s c *10 + *100
Regards, Simon