
Hi,
On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 at 05:21, Andre Przywara andre.przywara@arm.com wrote:
On Thu, 14 Oct 2021 12:24:45 -0600 Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org wrote:
Hi Simon,
On Thu, 14 Oct 2021 at 02:40, Peter Hoyes peter.hoyes@arm.com wrote:
From: Peter Hoyes Peter.Hoyes@arm.com
If using OF_CONTROL, fdtcontroladdr is set to the fdt used to configure U-Boot. When using PXE, if no fdt is defined in the menu file, and there is no fdt at fdt_addr, add fall back on fdtcontroladdr too.
We are developing board support for the Armv8r64 FVP using config_distro_bootcmd. We are also using OF_BOARD and would like the PXE boot option to default to the fdt provided by board_fdt_blob_setup.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hoyes Peter.Hoyes@arm.com
cmd/pxe_utils.c | 8 +++++++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/cmd/pxe_utils.c b/cmd/pxe_utils.c index 067c24e5ff..8f8e69ca97 100644 --- a/cmd/pxe_utils.c +++ b/cmd/pxe_utils.c @@ -556,7 +556,10 @@ static int label_boot(struct cmd_tbl *cmdtp, struct pxe_label *label) * Scenario 2: If there is an fdt_addr specified, pass it along to * bootm, and adjust argc appropriately. *
* Scenario 3: fdt blob is not available.
* Scenario 3: If there is an fdtcontroladdr specified, pass it along to
* bootm, and adjust argc appropriately.
*
* Scenario 4: fdt blob is not available. */ bootm_argv[3] = env_get("fdt_addr_r");
@@ -646,6 +649,9 @@ static int label_boot(struct cmd_tbl *cmdtp, struct pxe_label *label) if (!bootm_argv[3]) bootm_argv[3] = env_get("fdt_addr");
if (!bootm_argv[3])
bootm_argv[3] = env_get("fdtcontroladdr");
if (bootm_argv[3]) { if (!bootm_argv[2]) bootm_argv[2] = "-";
-- 2.25.1
This is a bit strange as fdtcontroladdr is the control dtb that U-Boot uses.
Yes, that is the idea. This DTB should be as good as any, and this is the last check before giving up on DTs completely, so "U-Boot's DTB" (actually there is no such thing) is better than none at all. In fact EFI boot does the very same thing: https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/include/config_distro_boo...
Can you not set fdt_addr to that, if you need to? Is it not already set to that?
According to doc/README.distro, fdt_addr is reserved for DTBs residing at a (fixed?) ROM address. We don't really know yet where the DT comes from, the cleanest seems to be to be passed down from TF-A, in which case this would definitely not be ROM. board_fdt_blob_setup() knows this address, and this is what will be written to $fdtcontroladdr.
FWIW, this patch looks good to me.
OK.
But note that OF_BOARD is going to become an option, not something that let's us leave out the DT. Board vendors must provide a DT in U-Boot. So long as that is understood:
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org
Regards, Simom