On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 16:10 -0500, Peter Tyser wrote:
Hi Steve,
Steve Sakoman (10): ARM: Rename arch/arm/cpu/arm_cortexa8 to armv7 ARMV7: Add basic support for TI OMAP4 ARMV7: Add support for TI OMAP4430 SDP ARMV7: Add support for TI OMAP4 Panda ARMV7: Restructure OMAP mmc driver to allow code sharing between OMAP3 and OMAP4 ARMV7: Enable mmc support on TI OMAP4430 SDP ARMV7: Enable mmc support on TI OMAP4 Panda ARMV7: Restructure OMAP i2c driver to allow code sharing between OMAP3 and OMAP4 ARMV7: Enable i2c support on TI OMAP4 SDP ARMV7: Enable i2c support on TI OMAP4 Panda
It'd be preferred if you could reorganize the patch series to first make all CPU/SOC changes, then finally do 1 patch for each board. This is generally considered cleaner than having patches bouncing back and forth between common and board specific code. Right now the SDP and Panda boards each require 3 patches when 1 patch apiece should suffice. eg: ARM: Rename arch/arm/cpu/arm_cortexa8 to armv7 ARMV7: Add basic support for TI OMAP4 ARMV7: Restructure OMAP mmc driver to allow code sharing between OMAP3 and OMAP4 ARMV7: Restructure OMAP i2c driver to allow code sharing between OMAP3 and OMAP4 ARMV7: Add support for TI OMAP4430 SDP ARMV7: Add support for TI OMAP4 Panda
In the past I've had complaints that I should break each piece of functionality into a separate patch :-)
I'm happy to do whatever is preferred! Wolfgang, would you like a v4 with the proposed structure?
Regards,
Steve