On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 06:03:28PM -0500, Tom Saeger wrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 11:33:20PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 3/22/22 23:16, Tom Saeger wrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 10:41:40PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 3/22/22 22:21, Tom Saeger wrote:
Since be66b89da306 ("efi_loader: configuration of variables store") the choice of EFI_VARIABLE_FILE_STORE or EFI_MM_COMM_TEE is mutually-exclusive, however efi_var_to_file also allows for "neither". Set Kconfig choice optional.
Signed-off-by: Tom Saeger tom.saeger@oracle.com
lib/efi_loader/Kconfig | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/Kconfig b/lib/efi_loader/Kconfig index e5e35fe51f65..9add2a286ff4 100644 --- a/lib/efi_loader/Kconfig +++ b/lib/efi_loader/Kconfig @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ config EFI_SETUP_EARLY
choice prompt "Store for non-volatile UEFI variables"
- optional
Storing non-volatile variables is required by the UEFI specification.
How should a user understand that a boot option he just created vanishes upon reboot?
Please, explain your use case.
bootefi ${kernel_addr}
in this case linux kernel for an Armv8 platform. This platform does not want or need any variables to persist.
bootefi eventually calls efi_var_from_file(), where *NOT* defining CONFIG_EFI_VARIABLE_FILE_STORE would allow this use case to work, otherwise it fails. This was possible before be66b89da306 ("efi_loader: configuration of variables store").
Please, describe exactly what does not work. Is it building or is it running the bootefi command?
after be66b89da306 CONFIG_EFI_VARIABLE_FILE_STORE is now selected due to Kconfig choice. This is the difference.
It fails while running, but the difference is the build. I'd rather configure for the old behavior - that being return EFI_SUCCESS from efi_var_from_file() when CONFIG_EFI_VARIABLE_FILE_STORE isn't defined.
The call-stack is something like:
do_bootefi->efi_init_obj_list->efi_init_variables->efi_var_from_file
I think perhaps I stumbled upon an unsupported mode, which the prior Kconfig unintentionally allowed.
If so - this patch doesn't make sense.
It was however convenient for our application. (NO ESP, NO persistence)
Does your system have an ESP?
I'll look into this - perhaps it should, despite strong desire to disallow changes to it.
Where does bootefi fail?
When CONFIG_EFI_VARIABLE_FILE_STORE is defined, runtime complains (as it should)
"Failed to persist EFI variables"
Best regards
Heinrich
Appreciate all your feedback,
--Tom
Thoughts?
--Tom
Best regards
Heinrich
default EFI_VARIABLE_FILE_STORE help Select where non-volatile UEFI variables shall be stored.base-commit: 5f68470d69f853b1652ebe93525b60064717fe2e