17 Dec
2008
17 Dec
'08
4:52 p.m.
On Dec 16, 2008, at 5:47 PM, Liu Dave wrote:
was code breaking or just fixing it up to match the docs?
not break the system, because the bit[55] is reserved zero for e500/e500mc. so just fixied it to match the e500/e500mc docs.
Ok. I'd prefer we just expand the field to 0x3ff to match the EREF spec since the upper bits are reserved we'll always read them as 0 so no harm. And we dont have to change the code again in the future if we expand into those upper bits.
- k