On 2/10/07, Ulf Samuelsson ulf@atmel.com wrote:
The number of users far outweisghs the number of implementers and I think that we need to look at it from their point of view.
Would help a lot to have some of those users help with testing though.
We are not introducing any new interfaces here, just using the existing interfaces. This means that it will not be harder to do any modifications *after* the sam926x patches are applied. It will be easier since you have better overview.
Whatever. Please let me know when you're ready to continue.
I am ready to continue as soon as at45_split is applied. It is a real simple patch, it divides one more or less duplicated file into two files.
If I try to apply any sam926x patches without that, then It will crash the at91rm9200dk and cmc_pu2 board support.
Once this patch is applied, I can submit the at91sam926x patches and if/when they are accepted, then we have accomplished the most important goal to Atmel customers, which is that *tested* sam926x support is available from the primary U-Boot location and that you can build both at91 and avr32 from the same source code.
I consider all other activities secondary.
Best Regards Ulf Samuelsson ulf@atmel.com Atmel Nordic AB Mail: Box 2033, 174 02 Sundbyberg, Sweden Visit: Kavallerivägen 24, 174 58 Sundbyberg, Sweden Phone +46 (8) 441 54 22 Fax +46 (8) 441 54 29 GSM +46 (706) 22 44 57
Technical support when I am not available: AT89 C51 Applications Group: mailto:micro.hotline@nto.atmel.com AT90 AVR Applications Group: mailto:avr@atmel.com AT91 ARM Applications Group: mailto:at91support@atmel.com FPSLIC Application Group: mailto:fpslic@atmel.com Best AVR