
12 Aug
2015
12 Aug
'15
4:15 p.m.
On 10 August 2015 at 10:09, Masahiro Yamada yamada.masahiro@socionext.com wrote:
This can be simply written with list_for_each_entry(), maybe this macro was not necessary in the first place.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada yamada.masahiro@socionext.com
include/dm/uclass.h | 9 ++------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org
diff --git a/include/dm/uclass.h b/include/dm/uclass.h index d56877c..d214b88 100644 --- a/include/dm/uclass.h +++ b/include/dm/uclass.h @@ -240,12 +240,7 @@ int uclass_resolve_seq(struct udevice *dev);
- are no more devices.
- @uc: uclass to scan
*/ -#define uclass_foreach_dev(pos, uc) \
for (pos = list_entry((&(uc)->dev_head)->next, typeof(*pos), \
uclass_node); \
prefetch(pos->uclass_node.next), \
&pos->uclass_node != (&(uc)->dev_head); \
pos = list_entry(pos->uclass_node.next, typeof(*pos), \
uclass_node))
+#define uclass_foreach_dev(pos, uc) \
list_for_each_entry(pos, &uc->dev_head, uclass_node)
#endif
1.9.1