In message 41F2F68F-34F5-4D3B-8AA1-294589B48033@kernel.crashing.org you wrote:
Oops? This is expected and normal behaviour. Did anybody complain about this?
Real, any reason why? I understand on classic PPC this might be the case but I see no reason for it to be so on book-e parts.
Well, one reason might be to have identical code for all PPC systems ?
High memory means leave them in flash?
No I leave them at the relocated location in DDR.
Ah, I see.
All references to flash memory must be relocated to RAM, including the exception vectors, of course.
Any they are. I'm just removing a second relocation that is a hold over from how 6xx PPC exception vectors work.
Not only 6xx. Actually all PPC.
I don't think so. Seems to introduce a bug.
I disagree with that. It resolved a bug when I did. 'setenv autostart no; bootm'
That might be a problem only when using your broken autostart patches.
We will fix this by backing out that patch ;-)
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk