On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Marek Vasut marex@denx.de wrote:
Dear Otavio Salvador,
Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador otavio@ossystems.com.br
Changes in v2:
- add comments
- fix when we have vbus OR vdd5v
- improve patch short description
Changes in v3:
- change short-description prefix
arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mx28/spl_power_init.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mx28/spl_power_init.c b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mx28/spl_power_init.c index 4b09b0c..fdf810c 100644 --- a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mx28/spl_power_init.c +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mx28/spl_power_init.c @@ -564,6 +564,15 @@ void mx28_batt_boot(void) 0x8 << POWER_5VCTRL_CHARGE_4P2_ILIMIT_OFFSET); }
+static int mx28_valid_vbus(void) +{
struct mx28_power_regs *power_regs =(struct mx28_power_regs *)MXS_POWER_BASE;/* iMX23 uses POWER_STS_VBUSVALID_STATUS at same offset */return readl(&power_regs->hw_power_sts) & POWER_STS_VBUSVALID0_STATUS;+}
void mx28_handle_5v_conflict(void) { struct mx28_power_regs *power_regs = @@ -577,14 +586,19 @@ void mx28_handle_5v_conflict(void) tmp = readl(&power_regs->hw_power_sts);
if (tmp & POWER_STS_VDDIO_BO) {
/** VDDIO has a brownout, then the VDD5V_GT_VDDIO becomes* unreliable*/These should go into separate patch.
Ok; will split it.
mx28_powerdown(); break; }
if (tmp & POWER_STS_VDD5V_GT_VDDIO) {
if (mx28_valid_vbus() || (tmp & POWER_STS_VDD5V_GT_VDDIO)) {And if VDD5V_GT_VDDIO isn't true, this will crash.
On bootlets mx28_valid_vbus() just returns 1 but the code of mx23 does implement it and on the datasheet of mx28 it seems a valid check.
mx28_boot_valid_5v(); break; } else {
/* Neither 5v sees 5v so we power down */ mx28_powerdown(); break; }@@ -601,17 +615,15 @@ void mx28_5v_boot(void) struct mx28_power_regs *power_regs = (struct mx28_power_regs *)MXS_POWER_BASE;
/** NOTE: In original IMX-Bootlets, this also checks for VBUSVALID,* but their implementation always returns 1 so we omit it here.*/if (readl(&power_regs->hw_power_sts) & POWER_STS_VDD5V_GT_VDDIO) {
if (mx28_valid_vbus() &&And again ... you unconditionally add something that will break other boards that aren't supplied from 5V. This part isn't present in mx28 bootlets if I'm right, yes?
Yes; this check is there too. But the comment about the difference between mx23 and mx28 code is applied here too.
(readl(&power_regs->hw_power_sts) & POWER_STS_VDD5V_GT_VDDIO)) { mx28_boot_valid_5v(); return; } early_delay(1000);
if (readl(&power_regs->hw_power_sts) & POWER_STS_VDD5V_GT_VDDIO) {
if (mx28_valid_vbus() &&(readl(&power_regs->hw_power_sts) & POWER_STS_VDD5V_GT_VDDIO)) { mx28_boot_valid_5v(); return; }
Regards,