On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 04:58:50PM +0100, Sjoerd Simons wrote:
On Fri, 2024-01-12 at 09:40 -0600, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 16:06-20240112, Sjoerd Simons wrote: [...]
I am starting to wonder if https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/20231101170519.39627-1-afd@ti.com/ will help us here.
Yes absolutely that would be perfect. Can i suggest we land it as is for now ("fat monolithic config") and once those patches land i'm happy to split things up?
https://libera.irclog.whitequark.org/u-boot/2024-01-12#35590530%C2%A0I think Tom agrees in principle (and Simon already acked), so we could go down this road and refactor - I am always a bit squeamish about redoing work if the baseline changes or has a reasonable chance of change.. Just doing it once and cleanly is my preference.
Well lets see if this will land soonish then, that would be amazing :)
And yes, no doubt, doing it right the first time makes sense. On the other hand I'm wary about adding more and more blockers for this set.
I've merged Andrew's patch for allowing defconfigs to use fragments this morning.