14 Jul
2006
14 Jul
'06
9:14 a.m.
On Friday 14 July 2006 00:45, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
In message 000001c6a6ca$bd0b3230$a134800a@RudiDell you wrote:
I guess I don't understand what's going on enough then. Is it really an error to come across a bad block? I thought that was part of the deal when
It should at least be reported to the user - otherwise he assumes to have an error-free medium.
I am "voting" for David's implementation, since bad blocks are "normal" on NAND chips. And if I remember correctly, the "old" U-Boot NAND driver also just skipped the bad block upon erasing without reproting them.
Best regards, Stefan