On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 11:45:22AM +0800, Bin Meng wrote:
Hi Tom,
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 6:13 AM, Joe Hershberger joe.hershberger@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 7:04 AM, Tom Rini trini@konsulko.com wrote:
With more recent gcc versions we otherwise get an error like: note: expected 'const struct sockaddr *' but argument is of type 'struct sockaddr_in *'
and the common solution here is to cast, rather than re-work the code.
Cc: Joe Hershberger joe.hershberger@ni.com Cc: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org Signed-off-by: Tom Rini trini@konsulko.com
Acked-by: Joe Hershberger joe.hershberger@ni.com
I see this patch was assigned to me in patchwork. Patch 2&3 in the same series were applied by York to fsl-qoriq repo and patch 4 was applied by you to u-boot/master. So maybe you can apply this patch directly to u-boot/master?
Sure. I think I intended to assign this to Simon instead, sorry. The golden rule about patchwork assignments is I get 'em wrong sometimes, just pass it around if so :)