Hi Heinrich,
On Mon, 6 Jan 2025 at 10:00, Heinrich Schuchardt xypron.glpk@gmx.de wrote:
On 06.01.25 15:47, Simon Glass wrote:
This test was hamstrung in code review so this series is an attempt to complete the intended functionality:
- Check memory allocations look correct
- Check that exit-boot-services removes active-DMA devices
- Check that the bootflow is still present after testapp finishes
The EFI functionality duplicates bootm_announce_and_cleanup() and still uses the defunct board_quiesce_devices() so a nice cleanup would be to call the bootm function instead, with suitable modifications. That would allow bootstage to work too.
This series is based on sjg/master since the EFI logging was rejected so far.
Yes, it was rejected because a solution at the lib/log.c level would be more generic.
As I mentioned, that idea isn't suitable for programmatic use.
Tom suggested not to send patches that are for private enjoyment to the mailing list.
My contributions to U-Boot are only ever about private enjoyment :-)
Do you have any comments on the patches?
Regards, Simon