On 16:03-20231104, Kumar, Udit wrote:
On 11/3/2023 6:07 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
When config is enabled, the esm dt probe makes sense. Simplify by dropping board specific checks.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon nm@ti.com
board/ti/j721e/evm.c | 10 ++-------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/board/ti/j721e/evm.c b/board/ti/j721e/evm.c index d4f7c1d9f938..75d51a0552c4 100644 --- a/board/ti/j721e/evm.c +++ b/board/ti/j721e/evm.c @@ -531,10 +531,8 @@ err_free_gpio: void spl_board_init(void) { -#if defined(CONFIG_ESM_K3) || defined(CONFIG_ESM_PMIC) struct udevice *dev; int ret; -#endif if ((IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TARGET_J721E_A72_EVM) || IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TARGET_J7200_A72_EVM)) && @@ -543,24 +541,20 @@ void spl_board_init(void) probe_daughtercards(); } -#ifdef CONFIG_ESM_K3
- if (board_ti_k3_is("J721EX-PM2-SOM")) {
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ESM_K3)) { ret = uclass_get_device_by_driver(UCLASS_MISC, DM_DRIVER_GET(k3_esm), &dev); if (ret) printf("ESM init failed: %d\n", ret); }
Nothing related to this patch, but to get esm completely functional
Second k3_esm probing needs to be added in this file.
Also, DT changes are needed, in next sync
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231013102941.548209-1-n-francis@ti.com/
Understood. no action on the current series, I assume.