On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 12:20:46PM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla lokeshvutla@ti.com
board/ti/am335x/board.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
diff --git a/board/ti/am335x/board.c b/board/ti/am335x/board.c index 3e842d3187..566183e669 100644 --- a/board/ti/am335x/board.c +++ b/board/ti/am335x/board.c @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ */
#include <common.h> +#include <dm.h> #include <errno.h> #include <spl.h> #include <serial.h> @@ -26,6 +27,7 @@ #include <asm/emif.h> #include <asm/gpio.h> #include <asm/omap_sec_common.h> +#include <asm/omap_mmc.h> #include <i2c.h> #include <miiphy.h> #include <cpsw.h> @@ -892,3 +894,33 @@ void board_fit_image_post_process(void **p_image, size_t *p_size) secure_boot_verify_image(p_image, p_size); } #endif
+#if !CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(OF_CONTROL) +static const struct omap_hsmmc_plat am335x_mmc0_platdata = {
- .base_addr = (struct hsmmc *)0x48060000,
OK. So, off the top of my head, from Adam's series about converting omap3, OMAP_HSMMC1_BASE and company aren't defined correctly? Or we're playing games with that 0x100 offset? I bring this up as since we have defines for these base addresses already, we should make use of them, but in this case first we'll have to do... something, yes?