29 Mar
2005
29 Mar
'05
8:26 a.m.
On Monday 28 March 2005 21:58, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
I've tested the following and propose it as a fix, replace this: val = gd->bd->bi_intfreq/100; /* 10 msec */ with: val = gd->bd->bi_intfreq/1000; /* 1 msec */
I've also tested some of the network related functions to insure that no timeout conditions have appeared.
I want to post this patch but would prefer a code review from those that are more familiar with get_timer() use within the OCOTEA codebase.
I don't know why the 440 is handled separately.
Stefan, do you have an idea?
No. The 440 port was done by Scott McNutt smcnutt@artsyncp.com, if I remember right. But it seems that the fix is correct. Scott (or any other 440 users), any comments on this?
Best regards, Stefan