2 Feb
2008
2 Feb
'08
10:25 p.m.
Le samedi 02 février 2008 à 06:59 +0100, Stefan Roese a écrit :
I did think of that. I have no strong feeling about that. Except that if we put at91cap9adk under board/atmel, at91rm9200dk should go there too.
Right. I always prefer to "collect" board ports from one manufacturer/brand into a specific directory.
Manufacturer or brand/type ? Meaning, what do we do with the other AT91 based boards, which are not made by Atmel (cmc_pu2, csb637, kb9202, mp2usb) ?
Stelian.
--
Stelian Pop stelian@popies.net