Hi Stefano,
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 10:47:38AM +0100, Stefano Babic wrote:
Hi Peng, Ye,
On 09/03/2016 09:13, Peng Fan wrote:
From: Ye Li ye.li@nxp.com
Since the MX6UL/SL/SX only has one DDR channel, in CCM_CCDR register the bit[17] for mmdc_ch0 is reserved and its proper state should be 1. When clear this bit, the periph_clk_sel cannot be set and that CDHIPR[periph_clk_sel_busy] handshake never clears.
Signed-off-by: Ye Li ye.li@nxp.com Signed-off-by: Peng Fan van.freenix@gmail.com
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/soc.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/soc.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/soc.c index 91a3deb..bdd41b0 100644 --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/soc.c +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/soc.c @@ -278,7 +278,10 @@ static void clear_mmdc_ch_mask(void) reg = readl(&mxc_ccm->ccdr);
/* Clear MMDC channel mask */
- reg &= ~(MXC_CCM_CCDR_MMDC_CH1_HS_MASK | MXC_CCM_CCDR_MMDC_CH0_HS_MASK);
- if (is_cpu_type(MXC_CPU_MX6SX) || is_cpu_type(MXC_CPU_MX6UL) || is_cpu_type(MXC_CPU_MX6SL))
reg &= ~(MXC_CCM_CCDR_MMDC_CH1_HS_MASK);- else
reg &= ~(MXC_CCM_CCDR_MMDC_CH1_HS_MASK | MXC_CCM_CCDR_MMDC_CH0_HS_MASK);}
Acked-by: Stefano Babic sbabic@denx.de
This is a fix, and my question to you both: is it enough to merge it after 2016.03 ? I have not read about big issues due to periph_clk_sel, and maybe we can postponed it (or I merge directly into -next as several of you have already proposed).
Yeah. It's okay to merge after 2016.03.
Regards, Peng.
Best regards, Stefano Babic
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-53 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: sbabic@denx.de =====================================================================