On 06/21/2018 09:45 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Alex,
On 21 June 2018 at 04:01, Alexander Graf agraf@suse.de wrote:
On 06/21/2018 04:01 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Alex,
On 18 June 2018 at 08:52, Alexander Graf agraf@suse.de wrote:
On 06/18/2018 04:08 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Sandbox only has 128MB of memory so we cannot relocate the device tree up to start at 128MB. Use 127MB instead, which should be safe.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org
We should just drop into the fallback case if allocation fails, no?
I cannot see how the allocation could ever fail, now that we are definitely in sandbox RAM. So I'm OK with doing that if you are.
I think that's perfectly reasonable, yes :)
OK I will update the patch.
No worries. I pulled in most parts that I consider ready to efi-next already. I'll prepare a small patch set that takes patches from your set and my set and gets us a working sandbox efi_loader on top.
Alex