The 'n' variable is used as a loop counter, not as a physical address, and is used in a comparison with an int. So it makes sense to change its type from phys_addr_t to int.
Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi dariobin@libero.it Reviewed-by: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org Reviewed-by: Pratyush Yadav p.yadav@ti.com
---
Changes in v2: - Updated commit message. - Added Simon Glass review tag. - Added Pratyush Yadav review tag.
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c index c9a6c272bf..49ed15211d 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c @@ -75,8 +75,8 @@ static int single_configure_pins(struct udevice *dev, int size) { struct single_pdata *pdata = dev_get_plat(dev); - int count = size / sizeof(struct single_fdt_pin_cfg); - phys_addr_t n, reg; + int n, count = size / sizeof(struct single_fdt_pin_cfg); + phys_addr_t reg; u32 val;
for (n = 0; n < count; n++, pins++) { @@ -109,8 +109,8 @@ static int single_configure_bits(struct udevice *dev, int size) { struct single_pdata *pdata = dev_get_plat(dev); - int count = size / sizeof(struct single_fdt_bits_cfg); - phys_addr_t n, reg; + int n, count = size / sizeof(struct single_fdt_bits_cfg); + phys_addr_t reg; u32 val, mask;
for (n = 0; n < count; n++, pins++) {