4 Sep
2009
4 Sep
'09
10:58 a.m.
Mark Jackson mpfj-list@mimc.co.uk wrote:
The functions could also return (architecture dependant) a "remapped" address to be used, then we could support:-
Right, and that is the important part: If I'm allowed to return a remapped address, this API will be trivial to implement on AVR32. If not, it will be quite difficult (and make everything larger and slower).
Your idea is good; it's mostly similar to what map_physmem() does today, but perhaps the name is wrong, and I suppose it should probably flush the caches in addition to just remapping the address.
Haavard