Commit daa2da754afe ("binman: btool: gzip: fix packer name so that binary can be found") introduced some sort of work-around to make the gzip binary found by bintool. However, this work-around would need to be applied to any btool whose name is prefixed with btool_ (usually to avoid conflict with other python modules).
Instead, let's handle this specific case directly inside bintool so that the btools don't have to handle it themselves. This also reverts the now-unnecessary work-around for gzip btool.
To: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org To: Alper Nebi Yasak alpernebiyasak@gmail.com Cc: Quentin Schulz foss+uboot@0leil.net Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz quentin.schulz@theobroma-systems.com
--- Changes in v4: - fix buildman test by enforcing class name to be Bintool<packer> even for Bintools in files whose filename is prefixed with btool_, - Link to v3: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220930-upstream-gzip-binman-v3-v3-0-17c99d6d87ac...
--- Quentin Schulz (2): binman: bintool: remove btool_ prefix from btool names Revert "binman: btool: gzip: fix packer name so that binary can be found"
tools/binman/bintool.py | 3 ++- tools/binman/btool/btool_gzip.py | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- base-commit: 898bd53e6a930080cee7cd7b1a09120c4dfd9467 change-id: 20220930-upstream-gzip-binman-v3-91b83bf16795
Best regards,