-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 05/14/2013 03:42 PM, Lubomir Popov wrote:
Hi Tom,
Just a couple of things to clarify below.
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 07:09:33PM +0300, Lubomir Popov wrote:
Hi Tom,
On 14/05/13 17:52, Tom Rini wrote:
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 01:24:41PM +0300, Lubomir Popov wrote:
Hi Tom,
I'm currently busy with other work; on the other hand, careful rebasing shall require some time, especially the Palmas stuff. What would be the deadline for a V2 submission?
Meanwhile could you please have a look at the (already old) http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/232743/? A simple patch, shall be needed if we enable USB (for the uEVM along with our board). In general, what are your plans regarding USB (.../patch/232742/)?
Thanks for the reminder, I'll grab 232743 soon. 232742 looks OK, but
do
you have a patch around for uEVM still?
Not yet (didn't have the opportunity to test, although some uEVMs should be around at MMS). As you know, a patch shall be needed in the uEVM board file along with the common USB stuff.
Yeah, I can test it as well if you write it up, and may find the time if you point me in the right direction.
OK, shall do it.
Thanks!
[snip]
[snip]
Currently the scrm struct is defined for OMAP4 in the asm/arch-omap4/clocks.h file and I have already done the same for OMAP5 by analogy. I must admit however that this approach does not correspond to the latest way by which groups of OMAP hardware regs are defined, prcm in particular - a struct in omap_common.h, holding only the required regs, no padding and such garbage, and an init with the physical addresses in a .c file for the particular SoC (prcm-regs.c). But still the Panda board, for example, uses the old way for scrm. Therefore I did it the same for OMAP5, which was easier (I'm old and lazy ;) ).
Yes, I'm OK starting off with moving things into omap_common.h as-is and then updating them a bit later ala pcrm-regs.c.
Who is starting off, me or you? ;)
Since your series needs it (so we aren't writing to magic locations which isn't allowed), you please. Thanks!
- -- Tom