On 05/31/2016 04:58 PM, Sylvain Lesne wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
On 05/30/2016 05:22 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
Enable both features to reduce the SPL size by 6 kiB.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut marex@denx.de Cc: Chin Liang See clsee@altera.com Cc: Dinh Nguyen dinguyen@opensource.altera.com Cc: Pavel Machek pavel@denx.de Cc: Stefan Roese sr@denx.de
I tried to use the raw MMC boot (on the sockit, with current master
- your patches), so I changed the following:
--- a/include/configs/socfpga_common.h +++ b/include/configs/socfpga_common.h @@ -349,9 +349,10 @@ unsigned int cm_get_qspi_controller_clk_hz(void); #define CONFIG_SPL_FS_LOAD_PAYLOAD_NAME "u-boot-dtb.img" #define CONFIG_SPL_LIBDISK_SUPPORT #else -#define CONFIG_SYS_MMCSD_FS_BOOT_PARTITION 3 -#define CONFIG_SYS_MMCSD_RAW_MODE_U_BOOT_SECTOR 0xa00 /* offset 2560 sect (1M+256k) */ -#define CONFIG_SYS_U_BOOT_MAX_SIZE_SECTORS 800 /* 400 KB */ +#define CONFIG_SYS_MMCSD_RAW_MODE_U_BOOT_PARTITION 3 +#define CONFIG_SYS_MMCSD_RAW_MODE_U_BOOT_SECTOR 0x200 /* offset 512 sect (256k) */ +#define CONFIG_SYS_U_BOOT_MAX_SIZE_SECTORS 1000 /* 512 KB */
This should be 0x800 (was probably a typo in the original). Otherwise this should not break anything, yeah.
+#define CONFIG_SPL_LIBDISK_SUPPORT #endif #endif
AFAIK, there were two mistakes:
- FS_BOOT_PARTITION instead of RAW_MODE_U_BOOT
- CONFIG_SPL_LIBDISK_SUPPORT was missing
In fact, LIBDISK support was not used before you added the CONFIG_SYS_MMCSD_RAW_MODE_U_BOOT_PARTITION into the board config. The libdisk functions are needed for determining the start of the partition. Looking through the SPL MMC, the code originally loaded the u-boot image from a fixed offset on the card (2560 sectors), which is indeed not optimal.
So yes, please send the above patch, it'd be a nice improvement.
(I edited the offset to be able to use u-boot-with-spl.sfp directly)
With these settings, I think we run into the size problem reported previously in the ML.
So, enabling tiny printf could help, but we now get:
disk/built-in.o: In function `part_get_info_extended': ...u-boot/disk/part_dos.c:236: undefined reference to `sprintf'
So I think we can just put "info->name[0] = 0;" instead of the snprintf() calls, when using tiny printf.
There is more of that stuff in disk/ , at least part_efi.c and part_iso.c suffer from the exact same problem. I am not sure if setting the name to '\0' wouldn't break anything, CCing Simon as he was recently digging in those areas.
Also, take a look at this patch: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/626760/
I can submit those changes as two patches if it makes sense.
Please do.
Thanks, Sylvain