In message 1090250613.10358.7.camel@blarg.somerset.sps.mot.com you wrote:
What would you like? I meant to convey that:
Something that identifies a patch in a uniqe and correct way anc corresponds to the changelog.
... > - That its primary purpose was TLB/DDR related
Maybe for the first patch submitted under this subject.
Most of that information is geared towards potential searching of the archives, your information, my internal logging, and hopefully some form of "quick identification".
Where did I go wrong?
On 2004-07-16 you sent these messages:
[PATCH] MPC85XXADS-20040716.patch for TLB/DDR http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=5136550&forum_id=...
[PATCH] Part 1 of 2 MPC85XXADS-20040716.patch-1 for TLB/DDR http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=5137350&forum_id=...
[PATCH] Part 2 of 2 MPC85XXADS-20040716.patch-2 for TLB/DDR http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=5137351&forum_id=...
Now is this all the same stuff, or two or maybe even three different patches?
The subject says "for TLB/DDR".
Your suggested CHANGELOG entry says:
... * Updated OR3 to only use 1M, not 16M, for CADMUS. Thanks York! * Made MPC8540/8560ADS be 33Mhz PCI by default. ... * Removed moldy CONFIG_RAM_AS_FLASH, CFG_FLASH_PORT_WIDTH_16 and CONFIG_L2_INIT_RAM options. ... * Moved board specific PCI init parts out of CPU directory. ...
The README requires:
Changesets that contain different, unrelated modifications shall be submitted as SEPARATE patches, one patch per changeset.
To make this short: which of your 3 messages shall be added?
Wolfgang Denk