Hi everybody,
On 02/09/2014 01:51, Fabio Estevam wrote:
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 8:34 PM, Eric Nelson eric.nelson@boundarydevices.com wrote:
I believe that the Wand board is using the configuration files from the nitrogen6x tree.
Yes, I should have said "As it stands today only mx6qsabresd and congatec share the same mx6q_4x_mt41j128.cfg script."
I try to sumarize the result of the discussion. This file was factorized, but it was proofed that calibration data are very board specific, and factorizing this file is not correct. I agree with Fabio and Eric that it is very unlike to have the same calibration data for different boards and the reuse of the same data is not correct.
However, with this statement the patch should also unbind the congatec board from the sabresd, not only change the reference. A congatec specific board must be also created in congatec/cgtqmx6eval, and it is only a case that it has the same values of the sabresd.
Best regards, Stefano Babic