Hi Quentin,
Thanks for the review!
On mar., juin 04, 2024 at 14:22, Quentin Schulz quentin.schulz@cherry.de wrote:
Hi Mattijs,
On 6/4/24 2:04 PM, Mattijs Korpershoek wrote:
[...]
There seems indeed to be some inconsistencies around bootmeths versus bootmethods.
To me, we should use 'bootmeth' everywhere.
Simon, as the maintainer of bootflow, do you agree ?
I can spin up another patch to fix this.
c.f. https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/20211023232635.9195-1-sjg@chromium.org/
""" For version 2, a new naming scheme is used as above:
- bootdev is used instead of bootdevice, because 'device' is overused, is everywhere in U-Boot, can be confused with udevice - bootmeth - because 'method' is too vanilla, appears 1300 times in U-Boot"""
SO I think we should change it to bootmeth(s) indeed.
Ah, thank you for the link, that is helpful.
I've done the global rename, made this into a series here:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240604-bootmeth-typos-v2-0-821683a95aaf@baylib...
Reviewed-by: Quentin Schulz quentin.schulz@cherry.de
Thanks, Quentin