Hi Vasili,
On Tue, 2014-08-26 at 13:46 +0300, Vasili Galka wrote:
Initialization of pointer from integer shall be designated by explicit type cast.
Signed-off-by: Vasili Galka vvv444@gmail.com Cc: Alexey Brodkin alexey.brodkin@synopsys.com
board/synopsys/axs101/nand.c | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/board/synopsys/axs101/nand.c b/board/synopsys/axs101/nand.c index c7f90c4..ed2bb6d 100644 --- a/board/synopsys/axs101/nand.c +++ b/board/synopsys/axs101/nand.c @@ -62,8 +62,8 @@ struct nand_bd { uint32_t buffer_ptr1; /* DES3 */ };
-#define NAND_REG_WRITE(r, v) writel(v, CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BASE + r) -#define NAND_REG_READ(r) readl(CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BASE + r) +#define NAND_REG_WRITE(r, v) writel(v, (volatile void __iomem *)(CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BASE + r)) +#define NAND_REG_READ(r) readl((const volatile void __iomem *)(CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BASE + r))
static struct nand_bd *bd; /* DMA buffer descriptors */
Thanks a lot for your patch. It does fix warnings in "board/synopsys/axs101/nand.c"
But could you please make sure lines are properly wrapped?
This is what checkpatch.pl reports: --->--- $ scripts/checkpatch.pl [PATCH]_axs101 :_Fix_type_mismatch_warning.mbox WARNING: line over 80 characters #83: FILE: board/synopsys/axs101/nand.c:65: +#define NAND_REG_WRITE(r, v) writel(v, (volatile void __iomem *)(CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BASE + r))
WARNING: Use of volatile is usually wrong: see Documentation/volatile-considered-harmful.txt #83: FILE: board/synopsys/axs101/nand.c:65: +#define NAND_REG_WRITE(r, v) writel(v, (volatile void __iomem *)(CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BASE + r))
WARNING: line over 80 characters #84: FILE: board/synopsys/axs101/nand.c:66: +#define NAND_REG_READ(r) readl((const volatile void __iomem *)(CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BASE + r))
WARNING: Use of volatile is usually wrong: see Documentation/volatile-considered-harmful.txt #84: FILE: board/synopsys/axs101/nand.c:66: +#define NAND_REG_READ(r) readl((const volatile void __iomem *)(CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BASE + r))
total: 0 errors, 4 warnings, 0 checks, 10 lines checked
NOTE: Ignored message types: COMPLEX_MACRO CONSIDER_KSTRTO MINMAX MULTISTATEMENT_MACRO_USE_DO_WHILE NETWORKING_BLOCK_COMMENT_STYLE USLEEP_RANGE
[PATCH]_axs101:_Fix_type_mismatch_warning.mbox has style problems, please review. --->---
I mean messages saying "WARNING: line over 80 characters".
Regards, Alexey