Am 19.03.23 um 18:21 schrieb Marek Vasut:
On 3/19/23 11:43, Elmar Psilog wrote:
Without that patch it lost track to the node to scan speed and duplex. Patch was created by Marek Vasut, just tested by me.
Signed-off-by: Elmar Psilog <epsi at gmx.de> Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de>
changes v2: fix format issues changes v3: remove {} around single if, add reviewd..
drivers/net/dwc_eth_qos.c | 18 +++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/dwc_eth_qos.c b/drivers/net/dwc_eth_qos.c index 112deb546d..b9de205b8a 100644 --- a/drivers/net/dwc_eth_qos.c +++ b/drivers/net/dwc_eth_qos.c @@ -788,9 +788,21 @@ static int eqos_start(struct udevice *dev) */ if (!eqos->phy) { int addr = -1; - addr = eqos_get_phy_addr(eqos, dev); - eqos->phy = phy_connect(eqos->mii, addr, dev, - eqos->config->interface(dev)); + ofnode fixed_node;
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PHY_FIXED)) { + fixed_node = ofnode_find_subnode(dev_ofnode(dev), + "fixed-link"); + if (ofnode_valid(fixed_node)) + eqos->phy = fixed_phy_create(dev_ofnode(dev)); + }
+ if (!eqos->phy) { + addr = eqos_get_phy_addr(eqos, dev); + eqos->phy = phy_connect(eqos->mii, addr, dev, + eqos->config->interface(dev)); + }
if (!eqos->phy) { pr_err("phy_connect() failed"); goto err_stop_resets; -- 2.34.1
I would give a short reminder about the patch. Reviewed by Marek, ok for Ramon. Would be glad to see it in 2023.04.
We're already in 2023.04-rc4 , this is material for v2023.07 , i.e. for u-boot/next branch .
Ok, but does it change anything for the patch itself? As source isn't touched in last weeks it is still needed. Other way asked: Any action (from my side) needed? I just afraid your (@Marek) and my work gets lost. I would expect either an "accepted" or "rejected" (for a reason).