7 Sep
2023
7 Sep
'23
11:46 p.m.
Hi Heiko and Simon,
Thought I'd follow-up to keep this discussion going. The main thing I would like to decide first (as it lets me start relying on it in boot scripts) would be the UBI access syntax:
=> ls ubi 0:rootfs /boot => ls ubi 0:2 /boot
Do those look good? Should I be trying to mimic the accepted syntax of fs/ubifs/super.c:open_ubi()? Perhaps "ubi 0!rootfs" and/or "ubi 0_2"? Not using ':' leaves open the possibility for logical volumes (LVM2/UBI) to contain partitions - not that I expect anyone will want that. :)
Cheers, Sam