11 Apr
2022
11 Apr
'22
8:35 p.m.
On Thu, 31 Mar 2022 at 04:10, Andrew Scull ascull@google.com wrote:
When looking into possibilities for testing virtio drivers I was trying to simulate the device's responses in the virtqueue. It required a hack to get access to the virtqueue by accessing the driver's private data and only allows pre-programmed buffer returns but no dynamic responses, data or descriptor modifications.
This is an example of a regression test for the virtio-rng fix in the previous patch.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Scull ascull@google.com
test/dm/virtio.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org
Seems fine to me.