
Hi Marek Vasut,
On 08/09/2011 01:34 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Monday, August 08, 2011 10:01:19 AM Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi Hong Xu,
Le 08/08/2011 05:20, Hong Xu a écrit :
After DMA operation, we need to maintain D-Cache coherency. So that the DCache must be invalidated (hence CPU will fetch data written by DMA controller from RAM).
Tested on AT91SAM9261EK with Peripheral DMA controller.
Signed-off-by: Hong Xuhong.xu@atmel.com Tested-by: Elen Songelen.song@atmel.com CC: Albert Aribaudalbert.u.boot@aribaud.net CC: Aneesh Vaneesh@ti.com CC: Reinhard Meyeru-boot@emk-elektronik.de CC: Heiko Schocherhs@denx.de
V2: Per Albert's suggestion, add invalidate_dcache_range
V3: invalidate_dcache_range emits warning when detecting unaligned buffer
invalidate_dcache_range won't clean any adjacent cache line when detecting unaligned buffer and only round up/down the buffer address
- mva = start;
- if ((mva& (cache_line_len - 1)) != 0) {
printf("WARNING: %s - unaligned buffer detected, starting "
I'd rather have a message about "cache", not "buffer", e.g.
printf("WARNING: %s - start address %x is not aligned\n" __FUNCTION__, start);
__func__ is prefered in linux kernel :-)
__func__ is C99 standard. __FUNCTION__ appears more in U-Boot. ;-) GCC manual says some older GCC only recognize __FUNCTION__ . If we rely on GCC, it looks __FUNCTION__ will reduce troubles.
BR, Eric
mva&= ~(cache_line_len - 1);
- }
- if ((stop& (cache_line_len - 1)) != 0) {
printf("WARNING: %s - unaligned buffer detected, ending "
"address: 0x%08x\n", __FUNCTION__, stop);
Ditto.
Ditto.
[...]