
29 Mar
2012
29 Mar
'12
9:39 a.m.
Hi Stefano,
On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 16:43:51 +0200 Stefano Babic sbabic@denx.de wrote:
ok, understood. Then I will suggest you resubmit patches 1 and 2 with your work on Trats, because the patches belong together and they should be in the same patchset.
Hmm, I'm not the only one who is working on this board. Moreover some other targets are using this PMIC as well :-).
And Patch 3 can be already applied as it is, because it has no dependecies with the other ones.
The patch 3/3 depends on patch 2, which defines data for MAX8997 PMIC. And patch 2 depends on patch 1, since patch 1 provides:
+ int (*voltage_to_reg_conv) (int uV);
which function is defined in patch 2 :-).
--
Best regards,
Lukasz Majewski
Samsung Poland R&D Center
Platform Group