Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v1 2/3] wdt: Timeout better to be in microseconds

On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 1:44 AM, Andy Shevchenko andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com wrote:

Timeout in some abstract ticks is not what we are applying to get deterministic behaviour.

Convert name to show explicitly that we are using microseconds (for watchdog it's more than precise).

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com

drivers/watchdog/wdt-uclass.c | 4 ++-- include/wdt.h | 8 ++++---- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Bin Meng bmeng.cn@gmail.com